Atomic ets

Bengt Kleberg <>
Tue Dec 20 10:03:41 CET 2005


On 2005-12-20 09:59, Ulf Wiger (AL/EAB) wrote:
...deleted
> is. Can you? BTW, 20 items used to be roughly the 
> break-even point between a list and ets. After that,
> ets was superior for random access.

is this still true?
what would the number be for the list alternatives (dict, gb_trees,
etc)?


bengt




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list