CMP article in ACM's Queue Magazine
Ulf Wiger (AL/EAB)
Fri Dec 9 17:39:37 CET 2005
I have posted a comment:
"It is not true that concurrency forces people
to think in ways that are unnatural.
Conventional programming languages approach
concurrency in a way that is unintuitive, but
that's a completely different story.
Erlang (http://www.erlang.org) has been used for
over a decade in commercial products with lots of
concurrency, and we have lots of evidence that
the programming model is both intuitive and safe,
in fact more so that object-oriented design.
We are eagerly awaiting multi-core chips, as they
offer us a perfectly natural way to scale up the
capacity of our products.
Senior Software Architect
You are all welcome to tune in and disagree. (:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-erlang-questions@REDACTED
> [mailto:owner-erlang-questions@REDACTED] On Behalf Of Jay Nelson
> Sent: den 9 december 2005 17:15
> To: erlang-questions@REDACTED
> Subject: CMP article in ACM's Queue Magazine
> An article on cnet discusses an analysis by a Google
> researcher that cost of power to run their servers may
> outstrip the initial cost of the servers. He advocates
> multicore CPUs with slower clock speeds, but acknowledges
> that the lack of language tools for concurrency makes the
> transition difficult.
More information about the erlang-questions