Computer Language Shootout - concurrency
Wed Dec 7 08:19:41 CET 2005
Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>Another data point: they list HiPE as being about 18% slower than BEAM
>on the random benchmark. On our P4 Xeon, not using the performance
>counters just the regular time command, HiPE is instead 18% faster than
>BEAM. (Which still is disappointing.)
>So I'm not sure I have much confidence in their benchmarking methodology.
Could I take a look at the performance counters using?
More information about the erlang-questions