Computer Language Shootout - concurrency

[Nic Linker]

Mikael Pettersson wrote:

>Another data point: they list HiPE as being about 18% slower than BEAM
>on the random benchmark. On our P4 Xeon, not using the performance
>counters just the regular time command, HiPE is instead 18% faster than
>BEAM. (Which still is disappointing.)
>
>So I'm not sure I have much confidence in their benchmarking methodology.
>
Could I take a look at the performance counters using?

Best regards,
Nic Linker