Line numbers in stack traces

Mark Scandariato <>
Thu Aug 11 04:33:21 CEST 2005


On Aug 10, 2005, at 9:31 PM, Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:
<snip>
> Well yes, interpreting stack traces IS a waste of time for ANY 
> programming
> language.  I am very pleased to learn that there is a prototype 
> version of
> QuickCheck for Erlang:
> 	http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~rjmh/ErlangQC/
> Now if someone will just tell me where the actual source code
> 	http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~rjmh/ErlangQC/qc.erl
> went to (because I get a 404 when I try to download it),
> I'll be a happy camper.  There's a wonderful binary search tool
> that I'd like to see adapted to Erlang as well.

Seems to have wandered into the jungerl.




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list