Timebomb

Mickael Remond <>
Thu Oct 28 16:26:11 CEST 2004


Carsten Schultz wrote:
> Hi Peter!
> 
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 11:26:23AM +0200, Peter L wrote:
> 
>>So it seems indeed that it is the HTTP 1.0 YAWS implemen- tation
>>that needs improving...
> 
> 
> Just to make sure that nobody gets a wrong impression of the quality
> of Yaws...
> 
> Yaws itself is working well with HTTP/1.0.  (Otherwise none of my
> sites would show up in Google.)  As klacke pointed out, the reverse
> proxy code is probably having problems and is not recommended for use
> in real servers.

Yes. I confirm. Yaws is rock solid even with HTTP/1.0 for module that 
are experimental like the reverse proxy.

-- 
Mickaël Rémond
  http://www.erlang-projects.org/



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list