Thu Oct 28 16:26:11 CEST 2004
Carsten Schultz wrote:
> Hi Peter!
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 11:26:23AM +0200, Peter L wrote:
>>So it seems indeed that it is the HTTP 1.0 YAWS implemen- tation
>>that needs improving...
> Just to make sure that nobody gets a wrong impression of the quality
> of Yaws...
> Yaws itself is working well with HTTP/1.0. (Otherwise none of my
> sites would show up in Google.) As klacke pointed out, the reverse
> proxy code is probably having problems and is not recommended for use
> in real servers.
Yes. I confirm. Yaws is rock solid even with HTTP/1.0 for module that
are experimental like the reverse proxy.
More information about the erlang-questions