Publicity needed: was Re: Is erlang too small?
Wed May 12 18:11:10 CEST 2004
Le 12 mai 04, à 12:44, Joe Armstrong a écrit :
> On 11 May 2004, Jeffrey M. Einhorn wrote:
>> In summation as an Erlang developer I would like to see its user base
>> continue to grow and I feel including additional libraries would help
>> that cause by making current developers more effective and increasing
>> the features that might convince new developers to give the language a
>> Thanks for Erlang/OTP,
>> -jeff einhorn
> Well I guess all of us in this list agree about that.
I am not sure I agree. It depends on what we want to achieve. Erlang is
the best language I know. The first thing I want is for it to stay
good. What will be achieved by increasing the user base? One positive
thing would be if it increased the number of jobs I could get that
involved programming in Erlang. Another would be to reduce the risk
that the language is no longer supported in the future.
I can think of several negative consequences, however. Pandering to a
large user base could dilute the goodness of Erlang (thoughtlessly
adding things to make Erlang more friendly to Java or other mainstream
> The reason for using the same template is so that people will think
> we have made a gigantic web site.
Hmm, this seems rather deceitful, which I don't like. Besides, imagine
the following two possible reactions:
- Wow, these people have made a gigantic web site. Impressive, I want
to play with them.
- What sort of an idiot do these people think I am?
Which of these two hypothetical people would you rather see get
involved with Erlang?
More information about the erlang-questions