OSS (was Re: Stand Alone Erlang)

Shawn Pearce <>
Sun Mar 14 00:52:15 CET 2004


It is, and its an excellent tool.

However its expensive in the commerical world compared to CVS, and for
open source users its license isn't quite as friendly as the license
that covers CVS.

On the other hand, if you have this sort of problem, BitKeeper can
quickly become your best friend.


Roger Larsson <> wrote:
> On Saturday 13 March 2004 01.09,  wrote:
> > > - that our design environment is different enough frin e.g.
> > >   sourceforge that we have to duplicate the code and maintain
> > >   two separate versions;
> >
> > Hard, we're doing this now. Basically the revision control problem
> > is to have code in 2 different CVS systems and sync them.
> > Not trivial, or even hard.
> 
> Isn't this one of BitKeepers main features? (used for Linux kernel)
> http://www.bitkeeper.com/
> 
> /RogerL
> 
> -- 
> Roger Larsson
> Skellefteå
> Sweden

-- 
Shawn.

  #if 0
  	2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/fs/buffer.c



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list