ok or true? (fwd)

Bengt Kleberg bengt.kleberg@REDACTED
Fri Mar 5 14:05:35 CET 2004

Richard Carlsson wrote:


>I feel I must clarify some things here. I started out on a bold and
>brave mission to create a set of new standard libraries, using the
>module namespaces (packages). However, monsters ate my time, and all
>that I have done so far is to put the Erlang built-in functions (all
>currently in the module 'erlang') in different modules like
>'erl.lang.tuple', 'erl.system.debug', etc., and renaming some functions.
even at this level the new standard libraries are better than the old ones.


>I think the only really new code I have added to these libraries is the
>'erl.lang.list' module, which contains some new/alternative list
>functions. Oh, and some stuff for time and calendar. All the rest is
luckily enough i mainly use erl.lang.list, and the new functions are a 
great boon to me.


This communication is confidential and intended solely for the addressee(s). Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you believe this message has been sent to you in error, please notify the sender by replying to this transmission and delete the message without disclosing it. Thank you.

E-mail including attachments is susceptible to data corruption, interruption, unauthorized amendment, tampering and viruses, and we only send and receive e-mails on the basis that we are not liable for any such corruption, interception, amendment, tampering or viruses or any consequences thereof.

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list