Atoms in I/O lists
Wed Dec 15 10:49:03 CET 2004
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 08:54:39AM +0100, Raimo Niskanen wrote:
> > So, I feel I did not present a particulary strange case against
> > allowing atoms in I/O lists.
> I think you did.
> Yet another argument would be that: Not allowing atoms
> in io lists does catch runtime bugs. Sometimes the occasional
> 'ok' or 'true' atom happens to find its way into a list later
> destined for io. These bugs are caught by the runtime system.
I agree. I think this is the best argument for not allowing any more
types in I/O lists.
Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
More information about the erlang-questions