erlang:hibernate/1 with funs?
Bjorn Gustavsson
bjorn@REDACTED
Tue Aug 17 10:37:21 CEST 2004
When I actually tested the workaround I suggested below, it seems that
it doesn't work. (Or I have seriously messed up my test case.)
/Bjorn
Bjorn Gustavsson <bjorn@REDACTED> writes:
> You call hibernate/3 like this to give it a fun:
>
> hibernate(erlang, apply, [F, []]).
>
> We'll probably add an hibernate/1 function in R10B implemented
> like this in erlang.erl.
>
> The only disadvantage of using funs is if you do hot code replacement;
> OTP has no built-in support for replacing code referenced by a fun.
>
> /Bjorn
>
> Peter-Henry Mander <erlang@REDACTED> writes:
>
> > Hi gurus,
> >
> > After being informed of erlang:hibernate/3, I wonder if there's a
> > erlang:hibernate/1, similar in style to erlang:spawn_link/1 which takes
> > a fun argument? I prefer using funs which helps avoid exporting what I
> > consider to be internal module functions when spawning.
> >
> > Is there a drawback writing code with spawn_link/1?
> >
> > Pete.
> >
> > --
> > "The Tao of Programming
> > flows far away
> > and returns
> > on the wind of morning."
> >
>
> --
> Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
>
--
Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list