Zero C

David Hopwood <>
Tue Aug 10 18:01:32 CEST 2004


Joe Armstrong wrote:
> [...] The idea being to name types in an intuitive manner, for details read
>        http://www.sics.se/~joe/ubf/site/quick.html

UBF seems quite similar to several other formats that attempt to map
more closely to programming language data models than XML does, and that
were designed at least partly as reactions against XML's complexity -- for
example

  - Waterken doc (http://www.waterken.com/dev/Doc/)
  - YAML (http://www.yaml.org/)

It would be useful to consider to what extent they can be unified.

-- 
David Hopwood <>




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list