user-defined operators

Dave Love <>
Thu Apr 1 23:35:34 CEST 2004


"Valentin" <> writes:

> Insulting other people is saying even less about Arain controversy... let's
> put our over-inflated egos aside and go back to the reasons as to why would
> Erlang need ability to support user-defined operators.

That seems entirely backwards if it's directed at Richard O'Keefe, as
it appears.  I'm surprised to join a list and see such a bizarre
response to the kind of clear, authoritative explanations of the
relevant language topics I'd expect from him.

> Personally, I think that user-defined-anything is not such a great
> idea,

User-defined functions aren't a good idea??



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list