Thu Apr 1 21:43:03 CEST 2004
My guess is that at the time the binding was made
sablotron was more mature than libxslt.
But you don't have to bind at all with Erlang
since Erlang in itself is better, faster and more
feature rich than any XSLT implementation.
OK more fun anyway :-)
fredag 02 april 2004 02:31 skrev :
> One of the things that always puzzled me was
> why sablotron.erl was made, it seems to me
> that a binding to libxsl would be better,
> faster, more feature rich, etc.
> Was just wondering if there was any
> particular reason why sablotron was chosen?
More information about the erlang-questions