Parameterised modules
Sean Hinde
sean.hinde@REDACTED
Mon Sep 1 11:58:46 CEST 2003
Hi,
A few thoughts on the proposal for parameterised modules as presented
at the Erlang Workshop on Friday.
The two main examples given are nice enough in themselves, but
comparison with real world apps points out a couple of problems.
The first example is of a generic server, where the server module can
be parameterised with the name of the callback module and a process
registered name:
Server = server:new(Name, Mod).
If we look at gen_server however there are two startup functions - one
with 3 parameters and one with 4 - one which provides a registered name
and one which doesn't. It is not clear to me that a parameterised
gen_server could offer both variants (given a fixed number of
parameters in the module definition), withought imposing on the user
some convention that if the registered name was say '$undefined' then
the register step would be explicitly skipped.
The second example is of providing a user defined log function at
module instantiation. Every time I have wanted to provide for a user
definable log function I have also wanted to have a built in default
logger, and provide the caller the option to provide their own if
desired. I do not see any way to provide a default value for a
parameter in the proposal for parameterised modules.
So in summary the two weaknesses I see are:
1. There is no way to provide variable numbers of instantiation
parameters.
2. There is no way to provide default values for instantiation
parameters.
I do not see an easy way to fix these problems, and I would say that it
is fairly serious that these two potentially very common examples are
not covered well by the proposal.
I am also quite a bit concerned about the increased potential for
making spaghetti code - even the likelihood of a server module being
defined separately from where it is started up will make code
maintenance more costly.
Thoughts anyone? Any good examples of where this would be amazing? And
apologies if I have confused the heck out of the 90% of folks on the
list who were not there on Friday..
Sean
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list