Fri Oct 3 11:06:38 CEST 2003
Richard A. O'Keefe wrote:
> Pattern matching for abstract data types is precisely what my
> "Abstract Patterns" paper was about. Abstract patterns are almost
> the same as the "views" that have been proposed for Haskell, but
> "abstract pattern" is a rather clearer name.
The first thing a programmer will think about when confronted with this
term is the Abstract Factory Pattern, a wildly unrelated concept.
Personally, I'd name the entire concept "user-defined pattern matching"
or something similar, and use terms like "view" or "abstract data type
pattern" only when describing concrete mechanisms.
More information about the erlang-questions