Complexity Shock Horror II: the Sequel (was Re: MD5 in erlang
Mon Mar 31 17:04:39 CEST 2003
From: "Pierpaolo BERNARDI" <>
> BTW, I find this behaviour of the erlang parser puzzling:
> 51> 16#-123.
> 52> 16#.
> Is this intended? what's its rationale?
I mean, I know the correct syntax, I am wondering why
this doesn't raise an error.
I was cheking if by chance I had overlooked a bit of syntax
and 16#-123 was valid.
More information about the erlang-questions