R = catch foo() ?
Shawn Pearce
spearce@REDACTED
Fri Mar 14 22:56:58 CET 2003
Why is this ok:
case catch foo() of
R -> ....
end.
and this is not?
R = catch foo(),
....
Reason I ask is, I know foo is failing, so I wanted to
catch it instead of just saying:
R = foo()
for debug reasons to see why. In real production this
is being caught by a standard supervisor behavior and
is being restarted, but the supervisor won't restart if
the app doesn't start at least once successfully.
--
Shawn.
Don't you feel more like you do now than you did when you came in?
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list