ets vs. mnesia ram_copies
Tue Mar 11 20:17:29 CET 2003
> Does anyone have any tests they've put together comparing the
> performance of mnesia ram_copies (ram only tables, non replicated)
> and ets? I'm trying to get an idea of the loss I'll have in
> performance by moving from ets to mnesia.
> I realize it'll be slower. And my case isn't necessarily what
> others tested, blah, blah, blah. I just thought I'd seen a
> message about it a while ago, but couldn't find it in the
I did some a long time ago, with old versions of erts and mnesia, and it was
indeed slower. I do seem to recall noticing that the number of hops from
mnesia:dirty_read to ets:lookup was reduced since then to almost nothing for
a local node, so I guess nowadays there is not much difference.
My test was a 10 liner which just inserted and read 100,000 rows or so - not
hard to recreate and not very sophisticated.
NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER:
This email (including attachments) is confidential. If you have received
this email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete this
email from your system without copying or disseminating it or placing any
reliance upon its contents. We cannot accept liability for any breaches of
confidence arising through use of email. Any opinions expressed in this
email (including attachments) are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect our opinions. We will not accept responsibility for any commitments
made by our employees outside the scope of our business. We do not warrant
the accuracy or completeness of such information.
More information about the erlang-questions