problem with shared heap?

Matthias Lang <>
Thu Mar 6 12:57:01 CET 2003

david wallin writes:
 > You misinterpreted me, (or I didn't make myself clear). I don't expect 
 > it to be faster in all cases, but I wouldn't expect to see any cases 
 > where a shared heap performed worse than without it. Maybe on par, but 
 > not worse. Hence my question, will there be cases where using a shared 
 > heap will degrade performance?



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list