OTP vs. non-OTP
Fri Jan 31 14:08:47 CET 2003
Joakim G. wrote:
> Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>> "Joakim G." <> wrote:
>>> 2) Only a handful of people seems to be able to grasp all what OTP has
>>> to offer.
>> So is this a problem? I don't grasp all of OTP (e.g. I know nothing
>> about Corba). Does that make OTP a bad thing?
> Oh well. With OTP *I* mean modules such as application, supervisor,
> gen_server, gen_fsm, supervisor_bridge, gen_event, error_logger,
> sys, appup, relup, release_handler, sasl, systools and some more.
> I should probably call this set of modules something else to stop
> confusing you all with the OTP acronym. Suggestions?
All of these used to be in the sasl application in the beginning. If
I remember correctly. They should have stayed there.
If you think the pen is mightier than the sword, the next time someone
pulls out a sword I'd like to see you get up there with your Bic.
More information about the erlang-questions