Strings (was RE: Structs)
Fri Jan 17 16:42:22 CET 2003
Sean Hinde wrote:
> > as well a 'string' type. (Oh no! Not that thread again :-)
> > /Jocke
> Well, as you mention it - I've been dabbling with XML recently and
> (apart from a growing view that for anything telecoms related this is
> quite the worst coding scheme I have had the misfortune to work with) I
> am running into the UNICODE issue.
> Lon Willets ucs contrib is great and all, but it would be awesome to
> have unicode strings in the core of Erlang (or at least unicode chars
> with the various conversions built in).
A space effective string type would be nice. Unicode or not.
The same for destructive assignment (A := 7). Almost joking. It would be
bad indeed to be flamed to death.
More information about the erlang-questions