Erlang vs Linux
Mike Williams
mike@REDACTED
Wed Feb 26 15:54:56 CET 2003
In article <5.1.0.14.1.20030226144907.00b69728@REDACTED>,
micke@REDACTED (Michael Fogeborg) writes:
|> Has anyone here seen an analysis explaning why and how Linux
|> came to what it is; where this ( Linux ) is compared to Erlang and
|> finally how the same thing ( that happened to Linux ) can be made
|> to happen with Erlang ?
It will happen, but it will take longer. Linux {is,was}n't new technoplogy it is
very much Unix based. Many people have been exposed to Unix and to adopt
Linux is a trivial mental operation.
Erlang requires more of a mental effort to adopt.
[functional, concurrent, distribution, symbolic, ha, dynamic_typing]
Even the dedicated advocates of functional programming will find something
the hate in this list (maye the last element? :-)
However the need for building distributed concurrent, reliable (HA or 7 * 24)
systems is becoming more and more apparent and people are learning how difficult
this is to do with convential languages.
That leaves us with [functional, dynamic_typing]
Well....
/m
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list