Banned Erlang

Klacke <>
Tue Feb 25 23:26:51 CET 2003


On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:45:11PM +0100, Daniel Dudley wrote:
> Luke Gorrie wrote:
> 
> > "Joakim G." <> writes:
> > 
> > > >>It looks like some department made a deal with Rational.
> > > >>No wonder they don't like UML on this list. :)
> > > >
> > > >My totally unbiased opinion about UML is that it is
> > > >inherently unsuitable for telecom systems programming.
> > > >
> > > My totally unbiased opinion about UML is that it is inherently
> > > unsuitable.
> > 
> > My totally unbiased opinion is that UML is in fact useful for Java
> > programs.
> 
> Spoilsport!  ;-)
> 


Yeah, and Luke has done tons of work in UML, right.

I bet you a lunch Luke, that if you were forced to use UML, you'd
be lookin for new job faster than .... I can check in code that doesn't 
compile...... or somethin.



/klacke


-- 
Claes Wikstrom                        -- Caps lock is nowhere and
Alteon WebSystems                     -- everything is under control          
http://www.bluetail.com/~klacke      
cellphone: +46 70 2097763



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list