volunteer wanted to write a few FAQ entries about Mnesia

Chandrashekhar Mullaparthi <>
Mon Feb 24 13:58:13 CET 2003


achieve this, but you are right, there is no explicit concept of aggregate


-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Pressey [mailto:]
Sent: 21 February 2003 22:05
To: Ulf Wiger
Cc: ; 
Subject: Re: volunteer wanted to write a few FAQ entries about Mnesia

On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 11:53:02 +0100 (MET)
Ulf Wiger <> wrote:

> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Chris Pressey wrote:
> >Records are accessed by a single key (which may be unique
> >or duplicate) and there is no concept of a secondary key.
> Actually there is. You can define an index on a non-key
> attribute, and access records using mnesia:index_read/3 or
> index_match_object/2.

Oops!  I meant there is no concept of an aggregate key, i.e. of using
multiple fields to identify a record.


This email (including attachments) is confidential.  If you have received
this email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete this
email from your system without copying or disseminating it or placing any
reliance upon its contents.  We cannot accept liability for any breaches of
confidence arising through use of email.  Any opinions expressed in this
email (including attachments) are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect our opinions.  We will not accept responsibility for any commitments
made by our employees outside the scope of our business.  We do not warrant
the accuracy or completeness of such information.

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list