Supervisor starts children in parallel
Mon Dec 1 20:56:42 CET 2003
The supervisor behaviour seems to start it's children in parallel.
I have a supervisor with two children in a one_for_all strategy.
This causes a chicken and egg problem when these processes act as
a pair. If they were started synchronously and in order there
wouldn't be a problem. It would be very handy if there were a
flag to specify either a synchronous or asynchronous startup.
How do folks deal with this?
More information about the erlang-questions