Package support in Erlang: Status ?

[Joe Armstrong]

> 
> I have also privately suggested that Erlang allow "dotted atoms" (that is,
> without single quotes) in other places as well, e.g. in registered names,
> ets tables, etc. This would make package support feel a little less like an
> afterthought, and more like an integrated part of the language.
> 

There goes the dot - I'd have liked the dot for "proper" structs -
(fortunately there is still ^ and ?) 

/Joe


> /Uffe
>