ic bug ...
Wed Jan 16 19:14:55 CET 2002
> A better and more future proof solution would be to actually check the
> return status from the command ;-).
> (I know you can't get it from os:cmd but the needed underlying
> mechanisms are present so we just need a
> "os:ext_cmd" that gives you return status as well.)
> The only user of this alternative preprocessor is mnesia_session.
> I am a bit puzzled that nobody detected this bug earlier. Are there
> any users of mnesia_session out there ?
Thank you for finding the cause of this problem. We did detect that
the preprocessor didn't work with gcc 3.0 in internal testing. We are
(slowly) reviewing the IC application so input about other problems
with IC and suggestions for improvements are welcome,
More information about the erlang-questions