Syntactic sugar poll
Erik.Johansson
Erik.Johansson@REDACTED
Fri Jan 11 14:09:12 CET 2002
I have a suggestion for a very small change that seems to arouse strong feelings.
Since I am doing a lot of assembly hacking I often need to use hexadecimal constants. All my debuggers and C compilers write hexadecimal constants as 0xN, but in Erlang I have to write it as 16#N. There are two problems with this, I can not copy and paste hexadecimal numbers between Erlang and other applications, and it looks really ugly. Now, don't get me wrong the general base#number syntax is flexible and useful but would it not be nice to have 0xN as syntactic sugar for 16#N in Erlang.
What do you think? Would it be nice to have this feature?
Are there any reasons for not allowing this feature?
I use it in the shell in my system (together with my fixes for printing hexadecimal numbers) but since it is not a part of standard Erlang I can't use it in Erlang code that I write (at least not in portable code ;) which is a shame.
All that is need to get it to work is this little patch:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
lib/stdlib/src/erl_scan.erl
505a506,512
+ scan_after_int([$x|Cs], Ncs, Toks, SPos, CPos) ->
+ case list_to_integer(reverse(Ncs)) of
+ 0 ->
+ scan_based_int(Cs, 0, 16, Toks, SPos, CPos);
+ Base ->
+ scan_error({base,Base}, CPos)
+ end;
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please, support this bill today!
/Erik
--------------------------------------
N. Erik M. Johansson
Studentvägen 13:33
752 34 Uppsala (Sweden)
happi@REDACTED
Work: +46 - (0)18 - 4711 033
GSM : +46 - (0)70 - 631 42 59
Home: +46 - (0)18 - 51 13 29
http://www.csd.uu.se/~happi/
Eric Conspiracy Secret Laboratories
--------------------------------------
I'm Happi, you should be happy.
Praeterea censeo 0xCA scribere Erlang posse.
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list