Dynamic Node Additions
Wed Dec 11 12:46:35 CET 2002
We use it a lot - but I have to say that it works alright in a simple case
where one is a primary node and the other is a standby. Throw in a few more
nodes with different applications supposed to failover to different nodes
and it hasn't really worked well in production. And when there is a problem
in live, there isn't much time to study what is happening. Just have to get
it working quickly. So we resort to restarting the nodes.
From: Per Bergqvist [mailto:]
Sent: 11 December 2002 11:34
To: Ulf Wiger
Cc: Per Bergqvist; DANIESC SCHUTTE;
Subject: Re: Dynamic Node Additions
> Having said that, we (AXD 301) don't use it. We have rolled
> our own distributed application controller (based on a
> prototype by Martin Björklund). It is not for the faint of
> heart, but ours works well and is extremely well tested.
And this is probably why the standard dist ac is still broken ...
Is anybody using it in commercial products ???
> I will look into making it available. The agreement with OTP
> was that it will eventually become part of OTP, but I will
> not promise that whatever I may publish will be compatible
> with whatever they may include in OTP in the future. (:
NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER:
This email (including attachments) is confidential. If you have received
this email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete this
email from your system without copying or disseminating it or placing any
reliance upon its contents. We cannot accept liability for any breaches of
confidence arising through use of email. Any opinions expressed in this
email (including attachments) are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect our opinions. We will not accept responsibility for any commitments
made by our employees outside the scope of our business. We do not warrant
the accuracy or completeness of such information.
More information about the erlang-questions