Erlang Grammer
Eric Merritt
cyberlync@REDACTED
Fri Aug 2 00:18:21 CEST 2002
Kent,
Thanks, your right its not exactly and EBNF but it
should work. If nothing else translating it to an
ANTLR grammer will be interesting.
Thanks,
Eric
--- Kent Boortz <kent@REDACTED> wrote:
>
> Eric Merritt <cyberlync@REDACTED> writes:
> > Does anyone know if there is an update Erlang
> grammer
> > available? I have been able to find one dated 1999
> as
> > an appendix to the spec located at the URL below.
> >
> >
> http://www.bluetail.com/~rv/Erlang-spec/index.shtml
> >
> > Is this Spec/Grammer still good? Has it been
> replaced?
> > If so where is the new version?
>
> Maybe not as easy to read as the the grammar in the
> specification but
> you can always look at the grammar in use in the
> source distribution
> of Erlang/OTP. The latest P9 snapshot
>
>
>
http://www.erlang.org/download/snapshots/otp_src_P9_2002-07-31.tar.gz
>
> contains the grammar definition in the file
>
> otp_src_P9_2002-07-31/lib/stdlib/src/erl_parse.yrl
>
> kent
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list