Some new mnesia benchmarking results
Wed Nov 7 14:23:07 CET 2001
> agree that mnesia is now getting ready for prime time as long
> as you have small
> records ;-).
> (Results are even more impressive on my little 1.7 GHz P4 Linux box )
Now Linux is a supported platform maybe this is the way to go..
> I have a nasty problem that I still haven't resolved.
> I you have more and larger records than you have available
> RAM the system will
> get on its knees.
I guess this is the nature of in memory databases.. The alternative is where
the db engine manages caching of regularly used objects in RAM and it dips
into disk to get other records. This is getting a long way from mnesia's
goals I guess.
> Does anyone have a solution on how to store 10Mx2K records
> with mnesia without
> 20GB RAM ?
It's probably worse than this as Erlang can only(!) address 4G of RAM. I see
this as the main limit now.. and fixing it is probably not trivial. One for
the "feature request" page.
NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER:
This email (including attachments) is confidential. If you have received
this email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete this
email from your system without copying or disseminating it or placing any
reliance upon its contents. We cannot accept liability for any breaches of
confidence arising through use of email. Any opinions expressed in this
email (including attachments) are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect our opinions. We will not accept responsibility for any commitments
made by our employees outside the scope of our business. We do not warrant
the accuracy or completeness of such information.
More information about the erlang-questions