Doubt about funs

Lon Willett <>
Wed Feb 21 14:44:23 CET 2001


So has anyone considered implementing a syntax like "fun Mod:Fun/Arity"?

It seems like an obvious thing to do.  And even a naive implementation
which just replaced the expression with "{M,F}" (losing the arity)
would at least provide a nice consistent way to express the intent.  A
good implementation would produce some dynamic function object that
was efficient, contained the arity, and was robust across code change.

/Lon
-- 
Lon Willett <>
Security Architect, SSE Ltd.
Fitzwilliam Court, Leeson Close
Dublin 2, Ireland
+353-1-216-2946
+353-87-8053539 (mobile)



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list