List append buglet...?

Mickael Remond mickael.remond@REDACTED
Mon Feb 5 14:38:16 CET 2001

On Mon, 05 Feb 2001, Robert Virding wrote:
> Yes, it is consistent, but whether it is the wanted behaviour is another
> question.  This definition of lists is the same as in Lisp and Prolog
> which were languages which strongly influenced the development Erlang.
> It would be difficult to change today as a change would have to be made
> to all list construction not just for append.  Otherwise how would you
> efficiently handle cases like:
> 	List ++ [a|b]
> Deep-checking the second argument is not really feasible.

Thank you for helping us to understand the behaviour of the append function.
I did not think about linking that to the 'cons' behaviour and your answer is
convincing: this is how the system is working and not a misbehaviour.

Thank you.

   Mickaël Rémond                    tel :      (33)
   Chef de projet                    mob :      (33)
   15 - 17 avenue de Ségur           e-mail :   mickael.remond@REDACTED
      75007 - Paris                  web :

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list