List append buglet...?
Mon Feb 5 14:38:16 CET 2001
On Mon, 05 Feb 2001, Robert Virding wrote:
> Yes, it is consistent, but whether it is the wanted behaviour is another
> question. This definition of lists is the same as in Lisp and Prolog
> which were languages which strongly influenced the development Erlang.
> It would be difficult to change today as a change would have to be made
> to all list construction not just for append. Otherwise how would you
> efficiently handle cases like:
> List ++ [a|b]
> Deep-checking the second argument is not really feasible.
Thank you for helping us to understand the behaviour of the append function.
I did not think about linking that to the 'cons' behaviour and your answer is
convincing: this is how the system is working and not a misbehaviour.
Mickaël Rémond tel : (33)1.44.42.00.00
Chef de projet mob : (33)18.104.22.168.16
15 - 17 avenue de Ségur e-mail :
75007 - Paris web : http://IDEALX.com
More information about the erlang-questions