>
Michelle Burns <> writes: > I worked out the problem. I had recomplied one of the modules with a > new version of my header file, where had I added a new field to the > record lsp_xconnect. Hence, there was a record definition > inconsistency. Makes you wish for something beyond the current preprocessor "hack" (as I was told it was in the first place)... Regards, --Daniel -- Daniel Neri
![]()