about graphics and GUI
Wed Sep 20 10:10:57 CEST 2000
The reason for dropping IG is that it takes too much time
and effort maintaining two applications doing more and less
the same thing, and we (OTP) consider IC better since it uses
a standardized way of describing interfaces (IDL) and can
generate interfaces Erlang-Erlang/C/Java, not only Erlang-C.
Don't know about any people getting into a mess.
Sean Hinde wrote:
> Hi Tobbe,
> > If not binary syntax is a must you may well try IG for this.
> I have downloaded it and plan to have a play when I get some time. It would
> be useful though if someone could explain what the pitfalls are which led
> Ericsson to drop it from Erlang/OTP in the first place. I think I read
> somewhere that it was to do with people getting themselves into a mess in
> their use of it..?
More information about the erlang-questions