Suggested Example/ emacs questions
Sun Oct 8 23:22:41 CEST 2000
Sean Hinde wrote:
> > I've read the Erlang book and I basically understanding how to use the
> > language. I've also read through most of the OTP docs, and I think I
> > understand most of what I read, but I still can't see the forest for
> > the trees. I get the basic idea of setting up supervisors and worker
> > processes, but there are many, many details which are not obvious from
> > the docs.
> I agree, and it caused me a lot of pain also.
same for me . havent grok everything yet. but thats a big steps between a
language, and an architecture...,
probably the latter is not so easy to explain or justify, as it rely on a lot
of implicit , undocumented assertions, that some call experience, and which is
> Now that I've figured it out
> though I find it quick and easy to produce a new application using the
> skeletons in emacs.
that was in fact my point.
on mandrake 7.1/7.2 and +, the skeletons deosnt works.
i got the message symbol's fnction definition is void: deactivate-mark.
(working in previous build)
i suspect its an emacs packaing issue, but in case somebody knows something
about it ---
also , what is this erlang-apwiz.el in r7b ?
any nice wizardry ?
First, they ignore you.
Then, they laugh at you.
Then, they fight you.
Then, you win.
Working code is what matter, not your market capitalization.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions