Monitoring of nodes..

[Martin Bjorklund]

Geoff Wong <
> wrote:

> Hmm, I gave my example incorrectly. Basically I was
> trying to indicate that net_kernel:monitor_nodes(true)
> gives the same behaviour as Pekka was explaining  with 
> the bif monitor_node.
> 
> erl -sname fud
> Erlang (BEAM) emulator version 4.9.1 [source]
> 
> Eshell V4.9.1  (abort with ^G)
> (
)1> net_adm:ping(
).
> pong
> (
)2> net_adm:ping(
).
> pong
> (
)3> net_kernel:monitor_nodes(true).
> ok
> (
)4> receive A -> A end.
> {
}
> (
)5> receive A -> A end.
>
> I never get a nodedown when I take down
 (after taking
> down
).

In this case it's because A is bound to {nodedown,
}, so the
receive just hangs, waiting for another nodedown from


Which OS are you running?  Do you which OS pekka is running?



/martin