Sean Hinde Sean.Hinde@REDACTED
Thu Aug 24 18:46:09 CEST 2000

> Many years ago (in a different galaxy) I though that QNX was
> a beautiful little OS that would blend nicely with erlang.

I have just spotted it and agree it has some very nice properties which seem
complementary. Not least:

* asynchronous message passing both intra and inter node built into the
kernel core,

* built in resiliency across multiple Ethernet links between nodes (various
methods including send on all and receiver selects the first to arrive, send
via another node..).

* hard real time.

* Claimed full POSIX compliance.

> This turned out to be a dead duck though, nobody wanted it and
> by now the code has probably rotted and is completely useless.
> Anybody interested in QNX would have to make a brand new port.
> This should probably not be too hard though since QNX has
> improved their posix support vastly since (I guess 1995) when
> the port was done

I'll have a go at compiling OTP on it if I get some time. It seems it might
be worth another look.


This email (including attachments) is confidential.  If you have received
this email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete this
email from your system without copying or disseminating it or placing any
reliance upon its contents.  We cannot accept liability for any breaches of
confidence arising through use of email.  Any opinions expressed in this
email (including attachments) are those of the author and do not necessarily
reflect our opinions.  We will not accept responsibility for any commitments
made by our employees outside the scope of our business.  We do not warrant
the accuracy or completeness of such information.

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list