Mon Aug 21 20:22:39 CEST 2000
James Hague wrote:
> >are there already some feedback on that approach ? is it "academic" or
> frozen ?
> >used in projects?
> I asked this not too long ago. The response was that the type system was a
> cancelled project.
any reason given ? i ve read some papers , like soft typing, type
verification, and so on.
is it cancelled for budget reason, or lack of interest, or as it broke the
currents existing code ?
or just because they dont believe hard enough in typing ?
or any other deeper technical reason ?
First, they ignore you.
Then, they laugh at you.
Then, they fight you.
Then, you win.
Working code is what matter, not your market capitalization.
More information about the erlang-questions