[erlang-patches] EEP Light: Option to override private key lookup when using Erlang ssh client

[Hans Nilsson R]

I would recommend the list erlang-questions@REDACTED for your
question, see

   http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

-Hans

On 11/12/2015 08:01 PM, Irina Guberman wrote:
> Hello dear Erlang developers,
> 
> I would tremendously appreciate any help or if anyone can point me to
> someone who can help with linking Erlang/OTP.   I created an
> experimental BIF in my own fork of erlang/otp, but can't get past
> linking stage (on Mac: Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64,  but
> same thing happens on ubuntu 14.04)  even though I checked everywhere
> and my BIF seems to be everywhere an existing BIF from the same module
> is (with same naming  conventions and all).   I don't know where to post
> this question either (Erlang Central didn't work which is
> understandable, it's not like people are creating BIFs everyday), I'm so
> desperate I'm about to post it on Twitter ;)  
> 
> Thanks a million for reading this message and even more so for pointing
> me to where I can get help with this!
> 
> Irina.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Hans Nilsson R
> <hans.r.nilsson@REDACTED <mailto:hans.r.nilsson@REDACTED>> wrote:
> 
>     Great!  If there also is documentation and a test case the likelihood of
>     acceptance is higher :)
>     -Hans
> 
>     On 11/12/2015 06:31 PM, Vipin Nair wrote:
>     > Hello Hans,
>     >
>     >> A more general way to pass options to the key callback module
>     would be
>     >> to introduce a second form of the key_cb option:
>     >>   -  keep todays {key_cb, Module::atom()} to keep compatibility
>     >>   -  introduce the variant {key_cb, {Module::atom(), ModuleOptions}}
>     >> [...]
>     >> In that way it is possible to write a callback module with
>     whatever is
>     >> needed as private options.
>     >
>     > This will work! In retrospect, I should have done this instead.
>     This is much
>     > simpler and solves my problem. I'll send a new pull request with
>     the suggested
>     > implementation. Thanks!
>     >
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     erlang-patches mailing list
>     erlang-patches@REDACTED <mailto:erlang-patches@REDACTED>
>     http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-patches
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4101 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-patches/attachments/20151112/914a2c33/attachment.bin>