[erlang-patches] [erlang-bugs] syntax_tools anonymous function error
Tue Oct 1 14:25:38 CEST 2013
Sorry, drowning in stuff as usual. Anthony, I trust that your analysis
of why that clause could be deleted, so that should be ok. But I thought
there was something weird about the format changes, and now I think I
see what it is: calls like arity_qualifier_body(Name) should never
return a naked atom or integer - always a syntax tree. So the fix for
the revert "fun F/A" case should be done in implicit_fun_name/1 instead,
just as it's handled for "fun M:F/A". And in the reverting of "fun
M:F/A", you shouldn't have to change anything at all, since it's already
On 2013-10-01 13:58 , Henrik Nord wrote:
> I was awaiting an answer to this:
> @richcarl <https://github.com/richcarl>Should I amend this commit?
> And the possible amend to the commit.
> If that is not going to happen I can put it through the test-merge precedure
> On 2013-10-01 13:27, Anthony Ramine wrote:
>> I see on the development page that an action is required from me for this patch .
>> And what exactly is required from me..?
>> Le 20 mai 2013 à 10:12, Fredrik a écrit :
>>> On 05/19/2013 12:33 PM, Anthony Ramine wrote:
>>>> Hello Michael,
>>>> This patch fixes support of implicit funs with variables in igor.
>>>> git fetchhttps://github.com/nox/otp.git igor-funs
>>> Hello Anthony,
>>> I've fetched your patch and it should be visible in the 'pu' branch shortly.
>>> BR Fredrik Gustafsson
>>> Erlang OTP Team
> /Henrik Nord Erlang/OTP
> erlang-patches mailing list
More information about the erlang-patches