[erlang-patches] [erlang-bugs] syntax_tools anonymous function error

[Richard Carlsson]

Sorry, drowning in stuff as usual. Anthony, I trust that your analysis 
of why that clause could be deleted, so that should be ok. But I thought 
there was something weird about the format changes, and now I think I 
see what it is: calls like arity_qualifier_body(Name) should never 
return a naked atom or integer - always a syntax tree. So the fix for 
the revert "fun F/A" case should be done in implicit_fun_name/1 instead, 
just as it's handled for "fun M:F/A". And in the reverting of "fun 
M:F/A", you shouldn't have to change anything at all, since it's already 
handled.

    /Richard

On 2013-10-01 13:58 , Henrik Nord wrote:
> Hi
> I was awaiting an answer to this:
>      @richcarl <https://github.com/richcarl>Should I amend this commit?
> And the possible amend to the commit.
>
> If that is not going to happen I can put it through the test-merge precedure
>
> /Henrik
>
> On 2013-10-01 13:27, Anthony Ramine wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I see on the development page that an action is required from me for this patch [1].
>>
>> And what exactly is required from me..?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> [1]http://www.erlang.org/development/
>>
>> Le 20 mai 2013 à 10:12, Fredrik a écrit :
>>
>>> On 05/19/2013 12:33 PM, Anthony Ramine wrote:
>>>> Hello Michael,
>>>>
>>>> This patch fixes support of implicit funs with variables in igor.
>>>>
>>>> 	git fetchhttps://github.com/nox/otp.git  igor-funs
>>>>
>>>> 	https://github.com/nox/otp/compare/erlang:maint...igor-funs
>>>> 	https://github.com/nox/otp/compare/erlang:maint...igor-funs.patch
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>> Hello Anthony,
>>> I've fetched your patch and it should be visible in the 'pu' branch shortly.
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> BR Fredrik Gustafsson
>>> Erlang OTP Team
>>>
>
> --
> /Henrik Nord Erlang/OTP
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-patches mailing list
> erlang-patches@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-patches
>