[erlang-patches] Correct ls/1 in c.erl
Bengt Kleberg
bengt.kleberg@REDACTED
Mon May 20 16:40:45 CEST 2013
I do not know why file:list_dir/1 has failed with {error, enoent}.
Or to be precise, I do not know what failure with {error, enoent} means
for the different cases I get from directories, files, links, special
files, none-existing files and the combination of read/no-read access
for these.
bengt
On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 16:36 +0200, Björn Gustavsson wrote:
> I'll try to clarify my question:
>
>
>
> Why test for existence at all if
> file:list_dir/1 has already told you that the
> file exists?
>
>
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Bengt Kleberg
> <bengt.kleberg@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>
> The filelib:is_dir/is_file/is_regular functions confuse me. I
> am unsure
> what they will return for directories, files, links, special
> files,
> none-existing files and the combination of read/no-read access
> for
> these.
>
> file:read_link_info/1 is more predictable.
>
>
> bengt
>
> On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 15:59 +0200, Björn Gustavsson wrote:
> > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Bengt Kleberg
> > <bengt.kleberg@REDACTED> wrote:
> > 6> file:list_dir("nosuchfile").
> > {error,enotdir}
> >
> > I think to use file:read_link_info/1 to establish
> the
> > existence of the
> > file/directory.
> >
> > Why?
> >
> >
> > If file:list_dir(Name) returns {error,enotdir}, it means
> that
> > there exists a file named Name (but it is not a directory).
> >
> >
> > If no such file exists, the return value will be
> {error,enoent}.
> >
> >
> > In what situation would it be useful to call
> > file:read_link_info/1?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
More information about the erlang-patches
mailing list