[erlang-patches] Fix receive support in erl_eval with a BEAM module
Wed May 8 12:01:12 CEST 2013
What you are saying is sensible. What name would you prefer for the function?
Le 8 mai 2013 à 11:56, Björn Gustavsson a écrit :
> We found it strange to put BEAM assembly language files
> in the STDLIB application (in theory, STDLIB should
> be possible to use in other Erlang implementations).
> I think that a better place would be to make it a pre-loaded
> module in the erts application. Also, I suggest that instead
> of calling a hard-coded function, the function can call a
> Also, I find the name match_clause() (in the erl_eval_receive
> module) confusing.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-patches