[erlang-patches] Return end locations in erl_scan
Wed Mar 20 13:49:56 CET 2013
Don't the tokens have a start position and a length? Why do you need an
explicit end position?
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Anthony Ramine <> wrote:
> Replying on list because I think it's important.
> As I said to someone I don't remember the name, this patch is only a
> necessary step to what my final goal is: Clang-like diagnostics for
> Erlang compilation . Is that something the OTP team wouldn't like
> to see?
> How is the end location in tokens redundant? I need the end locations
> of each tokens to be able to compute the location ranges of each node
> in the AST, see my work-in-progress commit for more informations .
> That being said, I am interested in having your feedback about the
>  http://clang.llvm.org/diagnostics.html
>  https://github.com/nox/otp/commit/2c8038c#diff-1
> PS: Sorry Hans for replying twice, I failed the Cc header.
> Anthony Ramine
> Le 20 mars 2013 à 13:23, Hans Bolinder a écrit :
> > Hi Anthony,
> > Sorry for not replying sooner.
> > We'll most likely reject you patch. I asked Vlad Dumitrescu about it,
> > and he agrees with me that the functionality (the end location of
> > tokens) is redundant.
> > Apart from that: when it comes to the implementation there are a few
> > things I don't approve of, but I need to take a closer look before
> > saying anything more. You've put in a good effort here, and I intend
> > to elaborate a little more on the implementation when I find the time
> > to investigate in more detail.
> > Best regards,
> > Hans Bolinder, Erlang/OTP team, Ericsson
> erlang-patches mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-patches