[erlang-patches] Optimize handling of local fun variables in v3_kernel

Anthony Ramine n.oxyde@REDACTED
Tue Jan 15 11:39:38 CET 2013


Hi Fredrik,

I can't find any modules nor on_load cases in cover_SUITE.

Regards,

-- 
Anthony Ramine

Le 15 janv. 2013 à 10:42, Fredrik a écrit :

> After further research we can see that the patch is also failing these testcases in tools,
> cover_SUITE, modules
> cover_SUITE, on_load
> 
> Please fix this and give me notice,
> 
> BR Fredrik Gustafsson
> Erlang OTP Team
> On 01/10/2013 01:33 PM, Anthony Ramine wrote:
>> Le 9 janv. 2013 à 17:32, Björn Gustavsson a écrit :
>> 
>>> The code handles free variables. As far as I can understand, there
>>> can be no free variables in this case, so you should simplify the code.
>> You're right and wrong :) There can be no free variables if the Core Erlang
>> code comes from a current Erlang module, but there can be if the Core Erlang
>> was handwritten or generated by my EEP37 patch, for example:
>> 
>> module 'foo' ['bar'/1,
>> 	      'module_info'/0,
>> 	      'module_info'/1]
>>     attributes []
>> 'bar'/1 =
>>     %% Line 4
>>     fun (_cor0) ->
>> 	letrec
>> 	    'Bar'/1 =
>> 		%% Line 5
>> 		( fun (_cor4) ->
>> 		let<Bar>  = 'Bar'/1
>> 		      in  case _cor4 of
>> 			<1>  when 'true' ->
>> 				1
>> 			<N>  when 'true' ->
>> 				let<_cor3>  =
>> 				    call 'erlang':'*'
>> 					(N, _cor0)
>> 				in  let<_cor1>  =
>> 					call 'erlang':'-'
>> 					    (N, 1)
>> 				    in  let<_cor2>  =
>> 					    apply Bar
>> 						(_cor1)
>> 					in  call 'erlang':'*'
>> 						(_cor3, _cor2)
>> 			  end
>> 		  -| [{'id',{0,0,'Bar'}}] )
>> 	in  'Bar'/1
>> 'module_info'/0 =
>>     fun () ->
>> 	call 'erlang':'get_module_info'
>> 	    ('foo')
>> 'module_info'/1 =
>>     fun (_cor0) ->
>> 	call 'erlang':'get_module_info'
>> 	    ('foo', _cor0)
>> end
>> 
>> In 'bar'/1, _cor0 is a free variable inside 'Bar'/1; thus free variables need
>> to be handled to remove the reverse eta conversion in a future-proof way.
>> 
>> The differences between master and my patch when running erlc +to_kernel foo.core
>> are:
>> 
>> --- foo.kernel.orig	2013-01-10 13:27:28.000000000 +0100
>> +++ foo.kernel	2013-01-10 13:27:36.000000000 +0100
>> @@ -5,18 +5,16 @@
>>  attributes []
>>  fdef 'bar'/1(_Xcor0) =
>>    do
>> -    bif (internal 'make_fun'/4)('-bar/1-anonymous-2-', 2, 0, 0, _Xcor0)>>  <_ker2>
>> +    bif (internal 'make_fun'/4)('-bar/1-Bar/1-0-', 2, 0, 0, _Xcor0)>>  <_ker1>
>>    then
>> -<<_ker2>>
>> +<<_ker1>>
>>  fdef 'module_info'/0() =
>>    enter (remote 'erlang':'get_module_info'/1)('foo')
>>  fdef 'module_info'/1(_Xcor0) =
>>    enter (remote 'erlang':'get_module_info'/2)('foo', _Xcor0)
>> -fdef '-bar/1-anonymous-2-'/2(_ker0, _Xcor0) =
>> -  enter (local '-bar/1-Bar/1-0-'/2)(_ker0, _Xcor0)
>>  fdef '-bar/1-Bar/1-0-'/2(_Xcor4, _Xcor0) =
>>    do
>> -    bif (internal 'make_fun'/4)('-bar/1-anonymous-1-', 2, 0, 0, _Xcor0)>>  <Bar>
>> +    bif (internal 'make_fun'/4)('-bar/1-Bar/1-0-', 2, 0, 0, _Xcor0)>>  <Bar>
>>    then
>>    match _Xcor4
>>      alt
>> @@ -34,10 +32,8 @@
>>  	call (Bar)(_Xcor1)>>  <_Xcor2>
>>        then
>>        do
>> -	bif (remote 'erlang':'*'/2)(_Xcor3, _Xcor2)>>  <_ker1>
>> +	bif (remote 'erlang':'*'/2)(_Xcor3, _Xcor2)>>  <_ker0>
>>        then
>> -<<_ker1>>
>> +<<_ker0>>
>>    end>>  <>
>> -fdef '-bar/1-anonymous-1-'/2(V1, _Xcor0) =
>> -  enter (local '-bar/1-Bar/1-0-'/2)(V1, _Xcor0)
>>  end
>> \ No newline at end of file
>> 
>> Fredrik, I'll fix the failing test cases from trace_local_SUITE and come back to you
>> when I'm done. Thanks for the feedback.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
> 




More information about the erlang-patches mailing list