[erlang-patches] xmerl_ug one word documentation fix

[Anthony Ramine]

What's the point of segregating patches?

Will I need to use the damn pull request form if I want to submit a small patch?

-- 
Anthony Ramine

Le 6 août 2013 à 12:25, Fredrik a écrit :

> On 08/05/2013 05:42 PM, David Welton wrote:
>> Change "wright" to "write".
>> 
>> --- a/lib/xmerl/doc/src/xmerl_ug.xmlsrc
>> +++ b/lib/xmerl/doc/src/xmerl_ug.xmlsrc
>> @@ -409,9 +409,9 @@ Data =
>>        specification but the basic functionality. For all details see
>>        the <seealso marker="xmerl_xs">reference manual</seealso></p>
>>      <p>First, some words about the xmerl_xs functionality:</p>
>> -    <p>You need to wright template functions to be able to control
>> +    <p>You need to write template functions to be able to control
>>        what kind of output you want. Thus if you want to encapsulate a
>> -      <c>bike</c> element in <p> tags you simply wright a
>> +      <c>bike</c> element in <p> tags you simply write a
>>        function:</p>
>>      <pre>
>>  template(E = #xmlElement{name='bike'}) ->
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
> Hello,
> Could you please read https://github.com/erlang/otp/wiki/submitting-patches , 
> A pull-request would be perfect for this type of changes!
> 
> -- 
> 
> BR Fredrik Gustafsson
> Erlang OTP Team
> 
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-patches mailing list
> erlang-patches@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-patches