[erlang-patches] better delete_any in gb_{sets, trees}, better difference in gb_sets

[Francesco Mazzoli]

Thanks for the comments, I'll look at this as soon as I have time.

Francesco.

On 31/05/12 13:30, Richard Carlsson wrote:
> Henrik's comments were a bit terse. I made some more detailed comments
> from an implementation perspective, under
>
>
> https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/5bb65b7c8db3a9cdc233d2f323581c95614cb3fb
>
>
> and
>
>
> https://github.com/erlang/otp/commit/5529e94bd91bc410d01a433084d586e98cf408ef
>
>
> I don't have time to do the changes myself right now, so I'd appreciate
> if you rework your patches along the lines of what I suggested.
>
> /Richard
>
> On 05/31/2012 02:07 PM, Henrik Nord wrote:
>> Hi
>> Your branch "gb-delete_any" has been reviewed with the following
>> comments:
>>
>>
>> fma/gb-delete_any
>> The commits should have been squashed.
>>
>> Rejected. Breaks the documentation which says that it does nothing
>> if the key is not present.
>>
>>
>> And for you branch "gb_difference" the comments are as follows
>>
>> fma/gb_difference
>> The commits should have been squashed.
>>
>> Clarify: Explain what is not sane with the current
>> gb_sets:difference/2 and gb_sets:is_subset/2.
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your contribution!
>>
>