[erlang-patches] Bug in yecc example

Henrik Nord <>
Thu Aug 18 17:27:41 CEST 2011

On 08/18/2011 05:05 PM, Garrett Smith wrote:
> git fetch git://github.com/gar1t/otp.git docfix

Your branch is based of the 'pu' branch.

Rebase it from 'dev'
> For this type of fix (trivial) is it acceptable to reuse a branch for
> multiple fixes? Or would you prefer a separate branch for each change?

Depends on what you mean here.
If you find alot of trivial doc errors at the same time, you can put 
them in the same branch separated in commits, and I will be able to 
graduate them all at once rather fast (make sure the documentation 
builds etc.)

If you find one, I graduate that, and then you reuse the same branch 
again for another fix later, I would rather have a new one due to naming 
and confusion issues.

/Henrik Nord Erlang/OTP

More information about the erlang-patches mailing list