[erlang-patches] Spelling fix: s/loose/lose/

[Björn Gustavsson]

On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Magnus Henoch
<magnus@REDACTED> wrote:
> One of my pet peeves is when people spell "lose" as "loose".  ("Lose"
> means "not win", but "loose" means "not tight".)  Hence this patch:

Thanks! Will include in 'pu'. I added your definition of "lose" and
"loose" to the commit
message to make it clearer why the change was made.

-- 
Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB