[erlang-bugs] ipv6 bug in inet:ntoa

Rik Ribbers rik.ribbers@REDACTED
Thu Jul 9 12:10:53 CEST 2015


Hello Raimo,

You're welcome. As I'm relatively new to Erlang, is there an external
source where I can monitor this issue?

Or provide a fix:

string:to_lower(erlang:integer_to_list(X,16))

Kind regards,
Rik

Op do 9 jul. 2015 om 11:44 schreef Raimo Niskanen <
raimo+erlang-bugs@REDACTED>:

> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 08:43:42PM +0000, Rik Ribbers wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've been playing around with ipv6 in erlang and came across at first
> > strange behaviour in converting string to ipv6 and back
> >
> > ~ --> erl
> > Erlang/OTP 18 [erts-7.0] [source-4d83b58] [64-bit] [smp:4:4]
> > [async-threads:10] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false]
> >
> > Eshell V7.0  (abort with ^G)
> > 1>inet:parse_address("2a00:d78::147:94:198:152:68").
> > {ok,{10752,3448,0,327,148,408,338,104}}
> > 2> inet:ntoa({10752,3448,0,327,148,408,338,104}).
> > "2A00:D78:0:147:94:198:152:68"
> >
> > If you look closely you will see that there is an extra 0 introduced.
> This
> > is actually correct. In IETF RFC5952 section 4.2.2 states that a single 0
> > must not be shortened. This however introduces however the question is
> the
> > inet:parse_address is actually correct, however it is being friendly to
> its
> > caller...
>
> There is no ambiguity here so why not.
>
> >
> > The real issue is however that the addresses are displayed in uppercase
> > which is simply wrong. As RFC5952 clearly states in section 4.3. There is
> > even Errata on this issue that states it must be in lower case.
> >
> > The RFC can be found here https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5952
>
> Oh dear.  We'll probably have to fix that.
>
> To my defence I will say that the code is from November 2009 which predates
> that RFC and that it tries to follow RFC 4291 or maybe RFC 3513.  It also
> uses
> erlang:integer_to_list/2 that produces uppercase, just for the same reasons
> that the rejected Errata voices...
>
> Thank you for pointing this out.
>
>
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Rik Ribbers
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-bugs mailing list
> > erlang-bugs@REDACTED
> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-bugs
>
>
> --
>
> / Raimo Niskanen, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-bugs/attachments/20150709/9ad68050/attachment.htm>


More information about the erlang-bugs mailing list